Independent review. Not run by the organizers Every claim below carries the date it was last checked
Home/Monetise Mania

Bonus offer

What is Monetise Mania?

Monetise Mania is the 90-day sales competition bundled into Monetise, and it is where nearly every revenue number in the Side Hustle Summit's marketing comes from. Below is the short list of what the vendor actually states, the one point where two vendor sources contradict each other, and the much longer list of things nobody publishes at all.

Short answer

It is a 90-day sales contest, included free as “Bonus 1” with the $1,995 Monetise program. The duration and the inclusion are confirmed on monetise.com. The headline prize figures are not: the widely quoted “$250,000 in prizes” appears on Whop’s blog, not on the vendor’s own offer page, and Whop is a platform Iman Gadzhi co-owns. No leaderboard, no ranking rules and no winners list are published anywhere.

The spelling, first

The vendor spells it Monetise, British style, across monetise.com and the product itself. “Monetize Mania” with a z is the common American misspelling and lands on the same thing. Both are used below only where a source used them.

What the vendor states

Monetise Mania is listed in the Monetise offer stack as Bonus 1, a 90-day competition. The positioning on the offer page is that prior experience does not matter: in the vendor's own words, everyone starts from scratch and anyone can win. Entry is included in the $1,995 price. We found no separate purchase, and no upsell to enter.

Figure showing Monetise Mania is a 90-day contest included as Bonus 1 at no extra cost.
Entry is included in the $1,995 price.

On prizes, the vendor's own page is deliberately vague. It describes prizes “worth tens of thousands” and states that the top 20 finishers get an in-person invitation to one of the company's offices. It does not publish a dollar total, and it does not publish a prize breakdown.

The contradiction worth knowing about

This is the most useful thing on this page, and it is the reason we cannot simply repeat the figure everyone else repeats.

Pull quote noting the $250,000 prize pool appears only on Whop's own blog, which Gadzhi co-owns.
We publish the conflict rather than pick a side.
Table setting Whop's blog description of a McLaren as a prize against monetise.com's description of a participant buying one with earnings.
Two vendor-side sources, two different claims about the same car.
SourceWhat it says about the McLaren
Whop company blog (October 15, 2025)Describes a 90-day contest with $250K in prizes, “including a McLaren and exclusive masterminds.” Reads as: the McLaren is a prize.
monetise.com offer page (checked August 31, 2026)Says a 19-year-old participant named Armando “made $111k and bought himself a McLaren.” Reads as: a participant purchased a car with claimed earnings. Not a prize.
Two vendor sources describing the same McLaren in different terms
Whop's blog lists a McLaren among the prizes. The vendor's own offer page describes a participant buying one with his earnings. Both are vendor-side.

Those are two different claims about the same car, and both come from the vendor's side of the table. Whop is not an independent source here: Gadzhi has co-owned it since April 2025, and the post in question is Whop's own case study of its own client. We cannot resolve which version is accurate, so we publish the conflict rather than pick a side. Nothing we found shows a McLaren being handed to a contest winner.

What nobody publishes

Three absences matter more than anything in the marketing, because each one is a thing you would need in order to judge your own odds.

Three unconfirmed rows: the ranking rule, the results distribution, and the prior experience of those named.
Each absence is something you would need to judge your own odds.
  • The ranking rule. No page states what competitors are actually ranked on. Gross revenue, net revenue, how refunds are handled, whether affiliate or referral sales count: none of it is published. “Tracked sales” is the phrase used, and “tracked” is never defined.
  • The results distribution. There is no leaderboard, no winners list and no placement record for any edition. Not a single finisher below the handful named in promotion is identifiable, and no source states what the median or bottom-half participant earned.
  • The prior experience of the people named. The vendor names Armando and his $111k. It does not say whether he had run a business before, and no independent source establishes it. Anyone telling you the top finishers were seasoned operators, or that they were all beginners, is guessing.

The earnings claims carry no disclosure

This is a straightforward, checkable finding. Monetise's pages carry specific revenue figures: $23.9M+ in tracked sales sitewide, $8.9M, $15M and $31M for successive 90-day runs, and the individual $111k. We could not find an income disclosure, an earnings disclaimer or a typical-results statement attached to any of them. On the date we checked, monetise.com/disclaimer returned a 404.

Figure showing the $23.9M sitewide tracked-sales figure carries no disclosure.
The figure is published. The basis for it is not.
Figure showing monetise.com/disclaimer returns a 404.
Absence of a disclosure is not proof a figure is false. It means no basis is published.

That is worth stating plainly and worth keeping in proportion. The absence of a disclosure is not proof that a figure is false. It does mean no published basis exists for treating any of these numbers as a typical outcome, and the FTC's stated position on earnings claims is that advertisers should not present exceptional results as representative ones.

How many editions have run

The vendor implies at least three. Its event page describes the sequence as $8.9M in tracked sales the first time, $15M the second and $31M the third. What it never does is name those runs, give them dates, or confirm that all three were Monetise Mania rather than a differently branded challenge. Searches for “Monetise Mania 2” and “Monetise Mania 3” return no vendor page defining either. If you are trying to work out which contest a given testimonial came from, that information is not published.

Bar chart of three stated runs: $8.9M, then $15M, then $31M in tracked sales.
The vendor implies three runs and names none of them.

The claim ledger for Monetise Mania

Same treatment as every other page here. Status and date on each row, and the source named.

Five ledger rows separating three verified facts from two marketing claims.
Status and date on every row, source named.

Monetise Mania is a 90-day competitionListed as Bonus 1 in the Monetise offer stack.

Verified
monetise.com/offer · August 31, 2026

Entry is included in the $1,995 Monetise priceNo separate purchase and no entry upsell found.

Verified
monetise.com/offer · August 31, 2026

Top 20 finishers get an in-person office invitationStated on the vendor offer page alongside prizes “worth tens of thousands”.

Verified
monetise.com/offer · August 31, 2026

No income disclosure accompanies the revenue figuresChecked monetise.com, the offer page and event.monetise.com. The disclaimer URL 404s.

Verified
monetise.com · August 31, 2026

The prize pool is $250,000Appears on Whop's blog, which Gadzhi co-owns. The vendor's own page gives no dollar total.

Marketing claim
whop.com blog · October 15, 2025

A McLaren is one of the prizesContradicted by monetise.com, which describes a participant buying one with earnings.

Marketing claim
whop.com blog vs monetise.com · August 31, 2026

What competitors are ranked onNo published rule states the metric, the refund handling or whether referrals count.

Unconfirmed
No source published

Who has won, and where everyone else placedNo leaderboard or winners list exists publicly for any edition.

Unconfirmed
No source published

The start and end dates of each editionThree runs are implied by revenue figures. None is named or dated.

Unconfirmed
No source published
Verified confirmed in writing by the organizers or vendorUnconfirmed not published anywhere yetMarketing claim asserted in promotion, no evidence published
Monetise Mania claims sorted into verified, marketing claim and unconfirmed
The whole page in one view. Four things the vendor states, two that only its own platform claims, and three that nobody publishes at all.

What this means if you are deciding

Monetise Mania is a real bonus with a real duration, and for the right person a 90-day competitive sprint is genuinely motivating. That is the honest case for it. The honest case against treating it as a reason to buy is simpler: a contest whose ranking rules, results distribution and winner list are all unpublished cannot tell you anything about your own likely outcome. Use it as a bonus you might enjoy, not as evidence about what the program returns.

Pull quote explaining the vendor spells it Monetise, British style, and that Monetize with a z is the American misspelling.
Both spellings land on the same thing.

The same reasoning drives the score in our Side Hustle Summit review, and the full Monetise review covers what the rest of the $1,995 buys.

How this site makes money: we earn a commission if you register for the summit through our links. We are not paid to reach a conclusion, and the organizers have no review or approval over anything published here. Full disclosure.

Common questions

Is Monetise Mania included in the $1,995?

Yes. It is listed as Bonus 1 inside the Monetise offer stack, with no separate purchase and no entry fee that we could find.

How long does Monetise Mania run?

90 days. The duration is stated on the vendor's own offer page and repeated in independent coverage.

Is the prize really $250,000?

That figure comes from Whop's company blog, and Iman Gadzhi has co-owned Whop since April 2025, so it is not an independent source. The vendor's own offer page publishes no dollar total, describing prizes worth tens of thousands and an office invitation for the top 20.

Did someone win a McLaren?

Two vendor-side sources disagree. Whop's blog lists a McLaren among the prizes. monetise.com instead describes a participant who made $111k and bought a McLaren himself. No source shows a McLaren being awarded as a prize.

What are competitors ranked on?

This is not published. No page states whether ranking uses gross or net revenue, how refunds are treated, or whether referral sales count.

Who won Monetise Mania?

No winners list or leaderboard is published for any edition. The only participant named on the vendor's page is a 19-year-old called Armando, and the page does not say he won or where he placed.

Is it Monetise Mania or Monetize Mania?

The vendor uses the British spelling, Monetise, on monetise.com and throughout the product. Monetize with a z is the common misspelling and refers to the same thing.